Dr. Stefano Montanari - From "Biolcalenda", nr. September 8, 2009
At a hasty reader might seem that what I am about to write is just my own. Alas, there is no reason I can not describe così.Per again, having already been the subject of numerous articles and even a book, a few years ago we - my wife, Dr. Antonietta Gatti and I mean - we were deprived of the main tool that allowed us to conduct searches around a scientific discovery is very important to my wife, that is, certain interactions of fine and ultra-thin body. Since being a European project directed Antoinette, left without an electron microscope, because that was the instrument, would mean the failure of years of work and the cancellation of a useful scientific progress.
Thus Beppe Grillo proposed to give publicity to the thing and to begin a collection of popular funds to purchase a new microscope. 378,000 Euro were the necessary sum, and 378,000 euros were collected within one year right. participated in the events Grillo during which told something of the research and, increasingly pagandomi expenses for more than 200 times in 12 months I gave public lectures at the end of which begged for money. Money coming to a charity of Reggio Emilia has become available and whose only care was that of cash money.
And this is all my unforgivable naivete: to prevent anyone else thought of evil, the same thing that happened then, I made the device just made payable to non-profit organization which legally became the owner. At this point, according to the president of that association, the Navy Bortolani, he said, that the microscope was necessary bureaucratic steps through which a public body, then, would shot at us.
Then, after several months of research, I found the Centre for Geobiology University of Urbino, whose director, prof. Rodolfo Coccione, lent itself to the task. Everything's fine until, on June 30 last year, I get a letter of non-profit organization in which it informs me that a couple of weeks before, he had "won" the microscope at the University of Urbino. This after she kept in the dark and long negotiations, he wrote the letter, with the piacet Grillo.
Some might ask what has Beppe Grillo say and what ever has to do with a kind of bizarre. Some might well wonder why the world would shackle us pleasure that the microscope was removed after that, with crystal clarity, he had stated many times in his shows and was insured for at least a couple of years on his blog that that money was raised only because we - my wife and I - we could have that device. Even the website of the non-profit Charles Bortolani contains a long post dated April 2007 which confirms that we are the only recipients of the microscope and that only my wife can decide how and where to use it. In addition, this is reported verbatim in the original agreement between the non-profit organization and the Centre for Geobiology of Urbino.
If you want an extravagant example of hypocrisy, then, read the condition with which our microscope will end in a university where there is no minimum experience of research for which all that money was scrape together: we can use the device "at least once a week." Leaving aside the fact that in our house and Urbino, there are more or less than 3 hours of travel, first of all, our research requires at least 8 hours per day of appliance use for at least 5 days a week and, not often, its use at night in an automatic mode (which belongs to us and that we will not give some of Urbino). Then we want to outline specific environments and equipment out there that do not exist. Then it takes technical know how to prepare samples to be observed and, again, at Urbino is not the kind of staff. And the money? Maintain a kind of contraption is very expensive and, notoriously, in universities there is a penny.
Why, then? The maneuver is all too obvious: as was already done when we took off the availability of the first microscope, our research should be "gagged . Gagged is the term used to shackle her time when, perhaps, those who care gli'interessi had not realized what it meant to really help us. The evidence that we show so much merciless as indisputable a nuisance, and so, to those who derive profit from the waste incineration selling our health, who wants to dot the Peninsula demented plant "biomass" who put his ashes in the garbage, concrete, who puts inorganic particles in vaccines, particles similar to those added to the food industry, and so on.
Now, then, that our results came up very high and threaten to go higher still, the danger becomes annoying. In short, to avoid trouble, better move along and do it quickly. This Bortolani which the Association had not thought of is that someone would react. Now a lawyer is receiving hundreds of messages from people who donated money for us and who see themselves crushed, and that lawyer-strong mandate received by donors, non-profit organization and will proceed against University of Urbino. Outraged many messages arrive University and non-profit organization that, maybe a bit 'naive because often I get a copy of those messages, respond to all that the protests are limited to 13 (!) letters.
Here: These are not just my own. With this microscope we have obtained results of absolute excellence, we searched for delicate being, my wife is the head of a European project involving 10 research centers in 6 different countries, we were able to pass a law that recognizes the pathologies "Depleted uranium nanoparticles" so that sick children who return from the mission of "peace" will no longer be left to die like dogs, we are hindering the havoc that is building incinerators everywhere, we are working on a system to clean up the city air, and so on. So much business is not exactly clean made rischio.Più someone recommended to my wife and me to get out of this dismal country. But we will be: leave would be to recognize that the mascalzonaggine is unbeatable. And we're used to winning
0 comments:
Post a Comment